RPT-Red tape trips up France’s green energy hopes for wind power

February 6, 2013 by  
Filed under Green Energy News


Mon Feb 4, 2013 4:09am EST

(Repeats Feb 1 story, no change to text)

* French onshore sector hostage to EU court decision

* Wind firms freezing hiring, investment

* Government struggles to cut bureaucracy

By Michel Rose

PARIS, Feb 1 (Reuters) – A legal battle with anti-wind
activists has frozen investment in France’s onshore wind sector,
threatening a “sea change” in energy pledged by Socialist
President Francois Hollande and his coalition partner Greens.

Hollande wants to see France boost its renewable energy
output from sources such as wind and solar power while closing
the oldest of its nuclear plants and eschewing shale gas
development.

But legal wrangling that threatens to drag on for months has
created uncertainty over the future of tariffs paid to producers
of wind power, halting needed investment.

Europe’s largest electricity exporter fell to fourth place
behind Italy in installed onshore wind power capacity last year.

“We had to stop hiring. And that’s a shame, because we see
the French unemployment rate rising, and we would have the means
to hire and projects that are ready,” Peter Schuster, head of
German turbine maker Enercon’s French unit, told Reuters.

Enercon last year installed one quarter of all new wind
turbines in France and has invested heavily since 2003,
employing 400 people and building a factory in Compiegne, 60
kilometres north of Paris.

But with the outlook for French wind power unclear, the
company has moved about 50 staff out of France to Germany and
Austria, where wind power is booming.

“It’s not helping us because we created everything
necessary: training centres, transport, offices. But we’re not
using them,” Schuster said. “The potential is here, and that’s
frustrating.”

LEGAL TACTICS

French anti-wind group Vent de Colere – Wind of Anger – has
battled against the development of the sector for years and last
year contested France’s onshore wind tariffs.

A French court has referred the case to the Court of Justice
of the European Union in Luxembourg which will now determine
whether the tariffs constitute undeclared state aid.

“Projects that need banking funding are finding it extremely
complicated, so we think there will be another slowdown in added
capacity this year,” Jean-Louis Bal, head of the SER renewables
energy lobby said.

“We’re not on the right track (to meet France’s 2020 energy
use targets), the current trend is really not good,” he said.

France under former president Nicolas Sarkozy set itself a
2020 target to install 25,000 megawatt (MW) of wind power
capacity supplying 10 percent of French electricity production.

But only 757 MW of onshore capacity was added to the grid in
2012, bringing the total to 7,449 MW versus more than 30,000 MW
in Germany.

Wind – onshore and offshore – makes up just over 3 percent
of France’s electricity production.

Some in the industry also feel frustrated as the government
stands firm, refusing to issue a new decree over the tariffs
while it awaits an EU court decision which could be as much as a
year away.

“In terms of legal tactics, it’s in their interest to wait,
use every opportunity to express support to the sector …but
stop short of issuing a decree, because that would be a
demonstration of guilt, a mea culpa,” said Serge Savasta, head
of renewable energy at private equity firm Omnes Capital.

The legal limbo could put some 1,000 jobs at risk in the
second half of this year, wind lobby group France Energie
Eolienne has warned.

BUREAUCRACY

France has Europe’s second-largest wind potential after
Britain, yet the tariff dispute reflects broader problems with
bureaucracy and litigation which have slowed its bid to tap this
energy source.

It takes on average eight years to set up a wind farm in
France, compared with about four years in other European
countries, Enercon’s Schuster said, because of repeated legal
challenges and a lengthy, two-track French permit process.

“Our problem is bureaucracy, and legislation changes every
second year,” Schuster said.

Any wind turbine higher than 12 metres, for example,
requires a permit from the local prefect and approval from a
dozen authorities including the culture ministry’s heritage
department, the ministry of defence, the weather forecaster, the
civil aviation authority, and the radio spectrum agency.

A green energy bill under discussion in parliament contains
measures to simplify administrative procedures, but the text has
gone back and forth between the two houses, following
filibustering by the opposition.

Omnes Capital’s Savasta said onshore wind power for France
compared favourably with other sources.

“Offshore wind takes time and French coasts are not very
suitable. Solar power is good but it’s much weaker in terms of
output capacity. Onshore wind is the most easily, quickly
deployable energy source,” he said.

“By delaying every fundamental decision to the end of the
debate, we’re shooting ourselves in the foot,” said SER’s Bal.
“In the meantime, foreign competitors have not stopped.”

(Reporting by Michel Rose; editing by Muriel Boselli and Jason
Neely)

Comments are closed.